Football: Wisconsin prepares to take on Miami in Pinstripe Bowl

first_imgThe University of Wisconsin football team will take on the Miami Hurricanes in New York City for the Pinstripe Bowl Dec. 27. The game will be an unexpected rematch of last year’s Orange Bowl where the Badgers.Each of these programs had a similar path to this bowl game. Both had high expectations with top 10 preseason rankings and both disappointed significantly earning only seven wins on the season.Junior Alex Hornibrook will start the game for Wisconsin after having what was perhaps the worst performance of his career to end the regular season against Minnesota. Hornibrook went 22-33 with 187 yards, two touchdowns and three interceptions in the 37–15 loss to the Golden Gophers — Wisconsin’s first loss against Minnesota in 15 years.Men’s basketball: Wisconsin faces Savannah State Thursday following overtime loss to MarquetteThe University of Wisconsin men’s basketball team will be back on the hardwood this Thursday as they take on the Read…Miami’s quarterback situation hasn’t been phenomenal either. A month into the season freshman N’Kosi Perry took senior Malik Rosier’s starting job. Perry was a four-star prospect coming into college and Miami head coach Mark Richt had high expectations for the quarterback coming into the season, but the results haven’t shown yet.On the year, Perry has 13 touchdowns and five interceptions while completing 52 percent of his passes. In his final game, Perry was almost non-existent in Miami’s 24–3 win over Pittsburgh, going 6-24 with 52 passing yards and zero touchdowns.Without significant production from the quarterback position, both teams have had to rely heavily on their run games.Lost in disappointing year for Badger football, Jonathan Taylor ready to finish historic seasonIf I told you before the season began that Jonathan Taylor would be entering the Badgers’ bowl game with 1,989 Read…For the Badgers, star back Jonathan Taylor is currently at 1989 yards and 15 touchdowns. Taylor’s season is already the fourth-best yardage wise among Wisconsin backs behind Ron Dayne’s 1996 season and 1999 season as well as Melvin Gordon’s 2014 season. But the sophomore could pass Dayne with a performance greater than 120 yards.Miami’s run game was led by Travis Homer and Deejay Dallas. Homer was the lead back with 969 yards and four touchdowns while Dallas complimented him with 609 yards and four scores.The game will take place Dec. 27 at 4:15 p.m. from Yankee Stadium with live coverage available on ESPN.last_img read more

First phase of groundwater management plan completed

first_imgWorkers at the groundwater sourcesThe Guyana Water Incorporated (GWI) has announced the completion of the first phase of its groundwater management plan, which entailed the geophysical logging of 100 wells along the coast of Guyana.This was revealed on Wednesday when the company stated that groundwater needs to be sustained, given the fact that it represents some 90 per cent of the supply chain on the coastland and 70 per cent countrywide. Adding to that, it is the “most reliable” source of potable water, furthering the need to sustain these sources.Groundwater is primarily extracted in Guyana using wells but the logging mechanism was implemented to garner data on the coastland aquifers and soil composition.For the project, GWI stated that “The logging was carried out in collaboration with Deltares, an applied research institute in water and subsurface environment and the Inter-American Development Bank under the Water Supply and Sanitation Infrastructure Improvement Programme (WSSIIP).”Manager of Water Resources and Climate Adaptation at GWI, Orin Browne had explained at a recent workshop that the outcome of the geophysical well logging survey was analysed and interpreted with the help of previous data. This information was interpreted and is being entered into a database which will form a physical model of the aquifer system.“The idea of building the model is to enable us to have a tool for predicting our groundwater abstraction and use because we realise that for Guyana’s future and the growth of future generations, there must be an integrated approach towards groundwater management and for the overall water resources management,” Brown had stated.Eight engineers from the utility company were also trained in modern well-logging techniques, analysis and data visualisations, which will be a crucial factor in GWI’s in-house well-drilling capacity with the acquisition of a new drilling rig.Guyana Times understands that when this database is completed, agencies such as the Hydrometeorological centre of the Agriculture Ministry, the Office of Climate Change, the Communities Ministry, the Guyana Geology and Mines Commission (GGMC), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Banks DIH Limited will be given access to the information.Acting Chief Hydromet Officer, Garvin Cummings was among the stakeholders to welcome the initiative since his agency is mandated to license well drillers.“All wells being drilled across the country should be guided by Hydromet. Obviously, this kind of information has not been available before, so once available to Hydromet, it will guide us in terms of the licensing of wells and well owners and well drillers. So it’s really critical to what we do, it is a guide to what we do in terms of where wells should be drilled and hopefully this can grow into helping us determine the abstraction rates for wells,” he stated.last_img read more

Evaluate system requirements Not all areas of you

first_imgEvaluate system requirementsNot all areas of your system may need an overhaul. If it isn’t broken, don’t fix it. Invest in areas of the system that will provide the fastest solution to problem areas, such as performance, usability, and security.I recommend you conduct a thorough architectural assessment of your current product to determine where your existing strengths lie and what areas are in greatest need. If you discover significant structural or performance problems in all layers (UI, service, and data), then a complete overhaul may be the best answer for your product.Alternatively, an incremental approach might be best if you find your core system is stable and structurally sound, or even too complex to refactor all at once. This approach will enable you to focus on specific capabilities that can be decoupled, rewritten, and integrated back safely over time.Be mindful of current customer baseWhat are your current customers willing to wait for? Are they satisfied with the product as-is or are they begging for new features immediately? Do they have the patience to wait for an entirely new package? Perhaps they are willing to pilot or try new things in beta to provide you with real-time input along the way.As a recommendation, take the pulse of your customer base to understand their frustrations or concerns with the current product. Assess their tolerance level for change during a period of transition from one product to another. Gathering specific concerns can help you evaluate if customers will react positively to rapid, incremental improvements over waiting for a completely new product.Consider the organizational impact on your teamsIncreasing the complexity of the environment your teams will need to operate in the future — such as new infrastructure, tools, and mindset — can be stressful. Have your teams obtained the training and experience needed to be successful in the cloud? Do they know how to manage a distributed microservices architecture?Incremental approaches are best for organizations that have adaptable team members, who can take on the challenges of learning new technologies while at the same time supporting the older application. On the other hand, a greenfield approach would be better for teams that you feel are less flexible and receptive to change. This approach will allow you to build up a new team with the right skills to match the technology.Determine long-term support costsAre you prepared for the possibility of supporting multiple products at the same time? With a complete overhaul, it’s likely some customers will not want to migrate to the new product or use the new features.Regardless of approach, I recommend that you have a clear sunset strategy in place to keep your customers aware of the changes coming so they can smoothly transition from the old product to new. Proactively communicate with your customer base as to their product options in the future. This way, your current customers can prepare themselves for an eventual shift to the new product. It’s safe to say that microservices architecture is no longer an emerging new trend, but a mainstream software development strategy. Microservices aren’t just ideal for developing new applications, but are also optimal when modernizing legacy applications. Writing functionality into bite-sized, reusable components is more efficient and speeds up development. It delivers code that meshes well with container technologies running in distributed, cloud environments built for scale and high performance. By 2022, 90 percent of all applications will feature microservices architectures, according to 2018 research by IDC.The merits of microservices often outweigh the merits of other development methods, yet there are other critical decisions to make during modernization projects. If the product is tied to revenues or customer care, you’ll need to consider how to best protect the application’s related revenue streams.But where to begin?Let’s consider a common scenario. Your executive team has just approved funding to modernize the platform that has been successful for your company for many years. While it’s been a profitable product, it was built with a legacy tech stack using a monolithic architecture pattern that has become fragile and unpredictable, and nearly impossible to update at the pace today’s customer’s demand. During the modernization journey, protecting the success of the product is paramount.First, you’ll need to begin by setting your modernization strategy. There are some patterns and trends that have become very well accepted and can provide a solid foundation:Leverage the cloud for dynamic and flexible storage and computing power. Cloud Platform providers like Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google Cloud Platform (GCP), and Microsoft Azure remove the burden of managing the day-to-day operations and enable teams to focus on creating new products and services.Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery (CI/CD), along with containerization tools and practices, enable engineering teams to develop and deploy changes at a rapid pace. Additionally, they enable continuous testing throughout the development cycle to ensure quality is built in from the beginning.From an application design perspective, microservices patterns have emerged fitting almost any application or service capability, and have become an extremely common approach to building out new or refactoring existing functionality.Once the basic building blocks are in place, you now must determine the best way to approach modernization that will take your company well into the future, all while minimizing any disruption to current revenue growth or customer support cycles.Greenfield: One approach is to build a new parallel product from scratch that will eventually replace the legacy application. Some call this the greenfield approach. Your organization can start fresh with an entirely new technology stack and not worry about integrating older technologies. For a groundbreaking project where innovation is vital to success, this might be the best choice. The downside of using the greenfield approach is that you must convince customers to migrate to a new platform, which entails a learning curve and initiatives. At the same time, you have to support two platforms simultaneously for an unknown time period. That’s expensive and takes more time and resources.Iterative. Another approach is the iterative one: you can incrementally re-factor capabilities and add new ones over time to the existing system. Customers don’t have to change systems or learn a new interface, and they’ll also see new updates faster. They can choose to turn a new feature on or off, giving them the ultimate flexibility. Development teams receive earlier feedback from customers on these new features and the overall costs are lower. Approaching microservices in an iterative fashion can be more complex, however, due to the necessity of blending monolithic legacy technologies with new cloud and container technologies.The basic building blocks we already mentioned can be applied to both approaches. Microservices, cloud infrastructure, CI/CD, containerization and continuous testing all fit nicely.The advice below can help guide you toward the right path for your company and product and mitigate the challenges of moving to a microservices architecture.Tips for a successful microservices modernization projectlast_img read more